AJP - Lung Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 291: L1118-L1131, 2006. First published August 4, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajplung.00277.2006
1040-0605/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/6/L1118    most recent
00277.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Isakow, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Isakow, W.
Right arrow Articles by Schuster, D. P.

INVITED REVIEW

Extravascular lung water measurements and hemodynamic monitoring in the critically ill: bedside alternatives to the pulmonary artery catheter

Warren Isakow and Daniel P. Schuster

Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

The recently completed Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial conducted by the National Institutes of Health ARDSNetwork casts doubt on the value of routine pulmonary artery catheterization for hemodynamic management of the critically ill. Several alternatives are available, and, in this review, we evaluate the theoretical, validation, and empirical databases for two of these: transpulmonary thermodilution measurements (yielding estimates of cardiac output, intrathoracic blood volume, and extravascular lung water) that do not require a pulmonary artery catheter, and hemodynamic measurements (including estimates of cardiac output and ejection time, a variable sensitive to intravascular volume) obtained by esophageal Doppler analysis of blood flow through the descending aorta. We conclude that both deserve serious consideration as a means of acquiring useful hemodynamic data for managing shock and fluid resuscitation in the critically ill, especially in those with acute lung injury and pulmonary edema, but that additional study, including carefully performed, prospective clinical trials demonstrating outcome benefit, is needed.

esophageal Doppler



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. P. Schuster, Univ. Box 8225, Washington Univ. School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110 (e-mail:daniel.schuster{at}wustl.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
R. M. Effros, P. Pornsuriyasak, J. Porszasz, and R. Casaburi
Indicator dilution measurements of extravascular lung water: basic assumptions and observations
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): L1023 - L1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
M. A. Matthay
Measurement of extravascular lung water in patients with pulmonary edema
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): L1021 - L1022.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. W. Lee and M. A. Matthay
Protein permeability in lung injury: now in real time again?
J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2007; 102(2): 508 - 509.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.