|
|
||||||||
Vascular Physiology Group and Department of Pediatrics, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
L-Arginine
(L-Arg) is metabolized to nitric oxide (NO) by NO synthase
(NOS) or to urea by arginase (AR). L-Arg is transported into bovine pulmonary arterial endothelial cells (BPAECs) by cationic amino acid transporter-2 (CAT-2). We hypothesized that cytokine treatment would increase L-Arg metabolism and increase
CAT-2 mRNA expression. BPAECs were incubated for 24 h in medium
(control) or medium with lipopolysaccharide and tumor necrosis
factor-
(L-T). L-T increased nitrite production (3.1 ± 0.4 nmol/24 h vs. 1.8 ± 0.1 nmol/24 h for control; P < 0.01) and urea production (83.5 ± 29.5 nmol/24 h vs. 17.8 ± 8.6 nmol/24 h for control; P < 0.05). L-T-treated
BPAECs had greater endothelial and inducible NOS mRNA expression
compared with control cells. Increasing the medium L-Arg
concentration resulted in increased nitrite and urea production in both
the control and the L-T-treated BPAECs. L-T treatment resulted in
measurable CAT-2 mRNA. L-T increased
L-[3H]Arg uptake (5.78 ± 0.41 pmol vs.
4.45 ± 0.10 pmol for control; P < 0.05). In
summary, L-T treatment increased L-Arg metabolism to both
NO and urea in BPAECs and resulted in increased levels of CAT-2 mRNA.
This suggests that induction of NOS and/or AR is linked to induction of
CAT-2 in BPAECs and may represent a mechanism for maintaining
L-Arg availability to NOS and/or AR.
urea; cationic amino acid transport; tumor necrosis factor; lipopolysaccharide; nitric oxide synthase; arginase
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ENDOTHELIAL CELL-DERIVED NITRIC OXIDE (NO) has many important functions in the lungs including vasodilation and involvement in oxidant injury and as an inflammatory mediator (15). NO is synthesized from L-arginine (L-Arg) via NO synthase (NOS). There are three isoforms of NOS: type I or neuronal NOS (nNOS), type II or inducible NOS (iNOS), and type III or endothelial NOS (eNOS). The nNOS and eNOS isoforms are constitutively expressed and are calcium dependent (15). The iNOS isoform is induced in response to cytokines, is calcium independent, and produces greater quantities of NO than either nNOS or eNOS (15). The enzyme arginase (AR) also metabolizes L-Arg to produce urea and L-ornithine (L-Orn). In the lung, endothelial cell-derived L-Orn can be utilized in the synthesis of proline and polyamines, which are important in recovery from lung injury (8). There are two isoforms of AR: AR1, which is constitutively expressed in liver and many other organs, and AR2, which is inducible by cytokines (9). Because isoforms of both NOS and AR are inducible by cytokines and the production of NO (2, 15, 21) and urea (2, 9) by endothelial cells can be increased by cytokines, we used cytokine treatment as a model of increased L-Arg metabolism in the present study. This model mimics the inflammatory processes seen during pulmonary diseases such as acute asthma, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and pneumonia.
Because cytokine treatment increases the metabolism of
L-Arg by NOS to NO and by AR to urea, an increase in
L-Arg metabolism might deplete intracellular
L-Arg unless L-Arg uptake is also increased by
cytokines. L-Arg is transported into endothelial cells
mainly via the system y+ amino acid transporters (1,
6). The genes encoding the system y+ transporters
have been cloned and designated as cationic amino acid transporter
(CAT)-1 and CAT-2 (7, 24, 29). The availability of
L-Arg to NOS and AR may be a critical factor in NO and
L-Orn production by cells. For example, we have previously
found that both NO and urea production in rat alveolar macrophages can
be increased by increasing the extracellular concentration of
L-Arg (22). Thus the purpose of this study was
to examine the hypothesis that cytokine treatment of bovine pulmonary
arterial endothelial cells (BPAECs) would result in an increase in both
L-Arg metabolism and L-Arg uptake. To test this
hypothesis, we measured nitrite (NO
(TNF-
) added. We also measured
NO
added.
| |
METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
BPAEC culture. BPAECs were obtained from Clonetics (San Diego, CA). On arrival, BPAECs were placed in T-25 flasks with 5 ml of endothelial growth medium (EGM; Clonetics) that contained ~250 µM L-Arg. When the BPAECs were 80-90% confluent, the cells were passaged with trypsin-EDTA followed by a trypsin-neutralizing solution. The BPAECs were then centrifuged at 1,200 g for 5 min, and the pellet was resuspended in EGM. We placed 9 ml of EGM in a T-75 flask and added 1 ml of the resuspended BPAEC pellet before returning the T-75 flask to the incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2-95% air. We used BPAECs between passages 3 and 8 for these studies.
On the day of study, the BPAECs were washed three times with 4 ml of HEPES balanced salt solution (HBSS; Clonetics). EGM (5 ml) was then placed on the BPAECs (control), and the cells were returned to the incubator at 37°C in 5% CO2-95% air for 24 h. In the cytokine-treated group, 0.5 µg/ml LPS (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) and 0.5 ng/ml TNF-
(L-T) were included in the EGM. In preliminary studies, we found that adding LPS alone at doses between 0.1 and 10 µg/ml had little effect on either NO
and LPS.
After 24 h, the medium was removed and stored in 1-ml aliquots
frozen at
70°C. The BPAECs were then washed three times with 4 ml
of HBSS. The cells were treated with either lysis buffer for protein
extraction or TRIzol reagent (GIBCO BRL, Life Technologies) for RNA isolation.
BPAEC protein isolation.
After the cells were washed three times with HBSS as described, 300 µl of lysis buffer [containing 0.4 ml of 10% SDS, 0.6 ml of 1 M
Tris · HCl (pH 6.8), and 9.0 ml of distilled water] were
added. The flask was shaken by hand for 3 min, during which time a
thick mucous film developed. The flask was then scraped with a cell
scraper, and 100-µl aliquots were frozen at
70°C for later
Western blotting. One aliquot from each flask was reserved for total
protein determination using a commercially available assay (Bio-Rad).
BPAEC RNA isolation.
TRIzol reagent (1 ml) was added to the flask containing the BPAECs,
which was then incubated for 5 min at 30°C. Chloroform (0.2 ml) was
then added, and the tubes were shaken for 15 s and incubated at
30°C for 3 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 g
for 15 min at 2°C before the supernatant was transferred to a fresh
15-ml tube. Isopropyl alcohol (0.5 ml) was added, and the mixture was
incubated at 30°C for 10 min and then centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 2°C. The supernatant was then discarded, and the pellet was washed with 75% ethanol and centrifuged at 7,500 g for 5 min at 2°C. The supernatant was again discarded, and the pellet was partially dried, dissolved in RNase-free water, and
stored at
70°C.
NO



Urea assay. The EGM samples were colorimeterically assayed in duplicate for urea as previously described (22). Each sample (100 µl) was added to 3 ml of chromogenic reagent [which contained 5 mg of thiosemicarbazide, 250 mg of diacetyl monoxime, 37.5 mg of FeCl3 in 150 ml of 25% (vol/vol) H2SO4, and 20% (vol/vol) H3PO4] or the same reagents with 0.5 units of urease added. After 1 h at 37°C, the mixtures were vortexed and then boiled at 100°C for 5 min. The mixtures were cooled to room temperature and the differences in absorbance (530 nm) with and without urease were determined and compared with a urea standard curve (22).
L-[3H]Arg uptake. After a 24-h incubation in either EGM or L-T, the BPAECs were washed three times with HBSS. To determine total L-[3H]Arg uptake, 4 ml of HBSS with 1 µCi/ml L-[3H]Arg were placed on the BPAECs in the T-75 flask. To determine the nonspecific uptake of L-[3H]Arg, additional BPAEC flasks had 4 ml of HBSS with 1 µCi/ml L-[3H]Arg and 10 mM nonlabeled L-Arg placed on the BPAECs in the T-75 flask. Two 100-µl samples of L-[3H]Arg-HBSS were placed in scintillation counting cocktail and inserted into a scintillation counter. After 15 min, the L-[3H]Arg was removed and the BPAECs were washed three times with ice-cold HBSS. Lysis buffer (300 µl) was added to the BPAECs in the T-75 flask and incubated at room temperature overnight. The 100-µl samples of lysed BPAECs were then placed in scintillation counting cocktail and inserted into a scintillation counter. Specific L-[3H]Arg uptake was determined by subtracting total L-[3H]Arg uptake from the nonspecific L-[3H]Arg uptake.
Western blotting. The lysed BPAECs were assayed for either eNOS or iNOS protein using Western blot analysis as previously described (5). Aliquots of cell lysate were diluted in a 1:1 ratio with SDS sample buffer, heated to 80°C for 15 min, and then centrifuged at 10,000 g at room temperature for 2 min. Aliquots of the supernatant were used for SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and blocked overnight in phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween (PBS-T) containing 5 g of nonfat dried milk and 3 g of albumin. The membranes were incubated with the primary antibody, iNOS (1:500 dilution; Transduction Laboratories) or eNOS (1:1,500 dilution; Transduction Laboratories), for 4 h and then washed with PBS-T with 1% nonfat dried milk. The membranes were incubated with the biotinylated IgG secondary antibody (1:5,000 dilution; Vector Laboratories) for 1 h, washed, and incubated with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (1:1,500 dilution) for 30 min. The bands for iNOS and eNOS were visualized using chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham) and quantified using densitometry (SigmaGel, Jandel Scientific). Authentic iNOS and eNOS were used as positive controls.
RT-PCR. RT-PCR was performed as previously described (20). RT reactions (20 µl) contained 1.0 µg of total cellular RNA, 200 U of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (PerkinElmer), 5 µM oligo(dT)16, 1 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, and 3 mM MgCl2. Reactions were incubated at room temperature for 10 min, at 42°C for 1 h, and then at 94°C for 5 min. PCRs contained 1.0 µM specific oligonucleotide primers for either eNOS or CAT-2. The eNOS primers were the previously described (20) forward 5'-TACGGAGCAGCAAATCCAC-3' and reverse 5'-CAGGCTGCAGTCCTTTGAT-3'. The CAT-2 primers were the previously described (7) forward 5'-AACGTGCTTTTATGCCTTTGT-3' and reverse 5'-GGTGACCTGGGACTCGCTCTT-3'. Additional components of the PCR included 5.0 µl of RT product, 3 mM MgCl2, PCR Buffer II (PerkinElmer), 0.2 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, and 2.5 U of AmpliTaq polymerase (PerkinElmer). PCRs were denatured at 94°C for 4 min and then cycled at 94°C for 1 min, 53°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min for a total of 30 cycles. Final extension was 5 min at 72°C. PCR products were visualized and sized by 1% agarose gel (0.5 mg/ml ethidium bromide) electrophoresis. Gels were photographed using Polaroid 667 film and digitized using an Epson 636 scanner. PCR product sizes were the expected 819 bp for eNOS and 613 bp for CAT-2.
Experimental protocols.
The following experiment was performed to determine whether L-T
treatment increased NOS and AR activities. Confluent control and
L-T-treated BPAECs were incubated for 24 h, and the medium was
sampled for NO


Statistical analysis.
Values are means ± SE. The production of NO
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The effect of L-T treatment on NO

|
The effect of L-T on eNOS protein levels is shown in Fig.
2. L-T treatment resulted in an increase
in eNOS protein. This somewhat unexpected result led us to confirm the
Western blot findings by performing RT-PCR for eNOS on RNA isolated
from the BPAECs, and the results are shown in Fig.
3. L-T treatment resulted in the
appearance of detectable eNOS mRNA bands. Control BPAECs probably have
a steady-state eNOS mRNA level that is below the level of detection of
our RT-PCR analysis. L-T treatment under the culture conditions of
these experiments led to an increase in both eNOS protein and mRNA. The
effect of L-T treatment on iNOS protein is shown in Fig.
4. L-T treatment resulted in an increase
in iNOS protein. Thus the increase in NO production caused by L-T
treatment was due to an increase in both eNOS and iNOS proteins.
|
|
|
Although L-T treatment increased both eNOS and iNOS proteins, the
production of NO due to iNOS was a significant portion of the total NO
production in the L-T-treated cells (as demonstrated in Fig.
5). Figure 5 represents the inhibition of
NO production by L-NIL and L-NAME as a percent
of the basal NO production. Both L-NIL and
L-NAME had a greater effect in the L-T-treated cells, which
suggests an increase in NO production by both eNOS and iNOS. However,
the greater effect of L-NIL in the L-T-treated BPAECs suggests that NO produced by iNOS was a significant portion of the
increased NO production caused by L-T treatment.
|
The production of NO could be influenced by the extracellular
L-Arg concentration (as illustrated in Fig.
6). In both control and L-T-treated
cells, increasing the extracellular L-Arg concentration resulted in a dose-dependent increase in NO production, and the effect
was greater in L-T-treated BPAECs compared with control BPAECs. The
production of urea could also be influenced by the extracellular
L-Arg concentration, which is shown in Fig.
7. In both control and L-T-treated cells,
increasing the extracellular L-Arg concentration resulted
in an increase in urea production, and the effect was greater at 10 mM
L-Arg in L-T-treated BPAECs compared with controls.
|
|
To determine whether the increase in L-Arg metabolism by
the BPAECs was accompanied by an increase in mRNA expression for CAT-2,
RT-PCR was performed for CAT-2 mRNA in control and L-T-treated BPAECs
(Fig. 8). In control BPAECs, there was no
detectable CAT-2 mRNA in any of the four experiments; however, in
L-T-treated BPAECs, there was detectable CAT-2 mRNA in five of the six
experiments performed.
|
To determine whether the increase in CAT-2 mRNA expression was
associated with an increase in L-Arg uptake, the uptake of L-[3H]Arg was measured after a 24-h
incubation in control and L-T-treated BPAECs. There was no difference
in the nonspecific uptake of L-[3H]Arg
between control and L-T-treated BPAECs (0.39 ± 0.01 vs. 0.36 ± 0.01 pmol). Figure 9 demonstrates that
specific L-[3H]Arg uptake was significantly
(P < 0.05) greater in L-T-treated BPAECs compared with
control BPAECs. Taken together, the mRNA and
L-[3H]Arg data suggest that the increase in
L-Arg uptake was due, at least in part, to an increase in
transporter number.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main findings of this study were that 1) cytokine treatment increased L-Arg metabolism by both NOS and AR, 2) the increase in NO production was due to an increase in both eNOS and iNOS, 3) NO and urea production could be increased by increasing the extracellular concentration of L-Arg, 4) cytokine treatment increased CAT-2 mRNA, and 5) cytokine treatment increased L-Arg uptake in BPAECs. These findings support our hypothesis that cytokine treatment results in increased L-Arg metabolism by both NOS and AR as well as increased uptake of extracellular L-Arg in BPAECs. The mRNA results suggest that the increase in L-Arg uptake was due, at least in part, to an increase in CAT-2 transporter numbers.
We demonstrate for the first time that the treatment of BPAECs with LPS
and TNF-
increased the mRNA for CAT-2. Furthermore, this finding
suggests that L-T induced an increase in CAT-2 transporter numbers in
BPAECs. This is consistent with findings in cardiac microvascular
endothelial cells where treatment with interleukin-1
(IL-1
) and
interferon-
led to increased CAT-2 mRNA expression (25). CAT-2 has been shown to consist of two subgroups:
CAT-2A and CAT-2B. CAT-2B clones are consistent with the system
y+ transporter (7, 24, 25), whereas CAT-2A
clones represent a phenotype consistent with a low-affinity CAT that is
insensitive to transstimulation (7, 24, 25). Thus it is
likely that the CAT-2B transporter numbers in the BPAECs were increased
by cytokine treatment in our study. This concept is consistent with a
previous study in rats, which found that treatment with LPS led to an
increase in CAT-2B mRNA but not CAT-2A mRNA in the lung (7).
In our BPAEC culture system, we found that the increase in CAT-2 mRNA caused by L-T treatment was also associated with an increase in the uptake of extracellular L-Arg. This suggests that the L-T-induced increase in CAT-2 mRNA led to increased CAT-2 transporter expression. Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in pulmonary arterial endothelial cell L-Arg uptake by cytokine treatment (10, 17). Those studies reported an increase in the kinetic maximal velocity parameter (Vmax) for L-Arg uptake (10, 17), a finding that is consistent with an increase in transporter number. Furthermore, the kinetic data from pulmonary arterial endothelial cells is consistent with the premise that the majority of L-Arg uptake is occurring via the system y+ transporter (6, 18). Thus, taken together, these results suggest that cytokine treatment increases expression of system y+ transporters in BPAECs, and that CAT-2 transporters are likely to be responsible for a portion of the increase.
Treatment with LPS and TNF-
increased eNOS protein and mRNA
expression in BPAECs in our study. Previous studies have suggested that
induction of iNOS may lead to a decrease in eNOS protein expression
(4, 12, 21). For example, de Frutos and colleagues (4) found that when BPAECs were grown in coculture with
bovine vascular smooth muscle cells (BVSMCs), treatment with IL-1
resulted in iNOS induction in BVSMCs but decreased eNOS protein
expression in BPAECs. This effect was not due to NO overproduction
because incubation with NO donors had no effect on eNOS protein
expression. However, TNF-
levels were increased in the medium, and
incubation with anti-TNF-
antibody prevented the decrease in eNOS
protein. This led the authors to conclude that IL-1
treatment
increased the production of TNF-
by the BVSMCs, which resulted in
decreased eNOS protein expression in BPAECs. In contrast, Liu and
coworkers (11) found that in cirrhotic rats, plasma
TNF-
levels and nitrates were elevated compared with controls and
that the expression of eNOS protein in the aorta was greater than in
controls. This finding suggested that increased TNF-
levels were
associated with increased eNOS protein expression. In the study by de
Frutos and colleagues (4), the reported TNF-
levels in
the media were 20-50 pg/ml, and in the study by Liu and coworkers
(11), the plasma TNF-
levels were ~17 pg/ml for
controls and ~48 pg/ml for cirrhotic rats. The present study utilized
a TNF-
concentration of 500 pg/ml. Thus it may be that the effect of
TNF-
on eNOS protein expression is dose dependent. Interestingly,
the TNF-
concentrations employed in these two studies were similar,
and yet the effect on eNOS protein was opposite (4, 11).
Therefore, the cell type and culture conditions may also determine
whether eNOS is upregulated or downregulated by iNOS induction. Our
results, however, demonstrate that eNOS protein and mRNA expression
were induced in BPAECs under the conditions employed in this study,
which suggests that eNOS may contribute to the increase in NO
production in L-T-treated BPAECs.
Treatment with LPS and TNF-
increased iNOS protein expression in
BPAECs in this study. The increase in NO production and protein
expression with L-T treatment is consistent with the well-described phenomenon of iNOS induction in a wide variety of cell types
(2-4, 7, 11, 12, 24). It is of interest to note that
under our culture conditions, iNOS protein was present in the control BPAECs. This may be due to the presence of fetal bovine serum in the
medium, which would result in activation of the control BPAECs. In
terms of data analysis, this "activation" would be expected to
decrease the differences between control and L-T-treated BPAECs.
However, in the conditions employed in this study, L-T treatment
increased iNOS protein expression and NO production in our BPAECs.
Furthermore, the L-NIL data suggest that iNOS activity in
these BPAECs was also increased by L-T treatment.
Treatment with LPS and TNF-
increased urea production in BPAECs in
our study. It has previously been shown that LPS induces AR protein
expression in macrophages (3, 23, 26, 28). Similarly,
hyperoxic exposure has been shown to induce AR protein and activity in
the lungs of rats (19). Interestingly, we found that urea
production in the BPAECs was 10-fold greater than NO production during
control conditions and ~25-fold greater than NO production after L-T
treatment. This suggests that AR is the major L-Arg
metabolic pathway in these BPAECs and is consistent with previous
studies measuring AR and NOS activities in rat aortic endothelial cells
(2) and in lungs from rats (19). The role of
increased urea production in the BPAECs is unclear. If BPAECs in
culture are representative of in vivo conditions, then the increased
urea production may be involved in the formation of polyamines and
proline from L-Orn. These processes are important in tissue
healing after injury (8, 23).
A previous study on rat lungs demonstrated that hyperoxic exposure
induced AR activity but did not induce iNOS activity. Therefore, the
induction of AR was felt to be associated with lung repair (8). In murine macrophages, the T helper type 2 (Th2)
cytokines IL-4 and IL-10 appear to be potent inducers of AR, whereas
the T helper type 1 (Th1) cytokine interferon-
appears to be a
potent inducer of iNOS (14). In general, Th2 cytokines are
considered to be anti-inflammatory, and Th1 cytokines are considered to
be proinflammatory (14). Thus it may be that AR induction
leading to increased urea production in certain conditions is
associated with tissue repair, whereas iNOS induction leading to
increased NO production is associated with the inflammatory response.
However, we found that both urea and NO production were increased by
the combined treatment of LPS and TNF-
. This finding is consistent with a previous study in rat aortic endothelial cells (2).
In macrophages, it has been suggested that the coinduction of AR with
iNOS may limit L-Arg availability to iNOS and thereby decrease NO production during the inflammatory response
(28). On the other hand, Buga and colleagues
(2) found that when NO production was increased ~20-fold
by LPS-interferon-
treatment, AR activity was inhibited. The authors
found that this effect was due to the intermediate in NO production
from L-Arg,
N
-hydroxy-L-arginine. The
inhibition constant (Ki) for
N
-hydroxy-L-arginine inhibition
of AR was ~10 µM. The levels of NO produced in our culture medium
were ~1 µM, and, therefore, it is unlikely that the levels of
N
-hydroxy-L-arginine produced
would be sufficient to inhibit urea production by AR. Although it is
unclear why both urea and NO production were increased by L-T
treatment, it does appear that some stimuli will lead to induction of
both AR and iNOS, whereas other stimuli will only induce one or the
other enzyme. Therefore, in situations where both AR and iNOS are
induced, the degree of iNOS induction may determine whether AR activity
will limit L-Arg availability to iNOS or whether enough
N
-hydroxy-L-arginine will be
produced to inhibit AR and thereby increase the availability of
L-Arg to iNOS. Further studies are needed to examine the
cellular mechanisms involved in iNOS and AR induction and the
interrelationship between iNOS and AR activities during inflammation.
The importance of L-Arg uptake to NO and urea production was demonstrated by the finding that increasing the extracellular concentration of L-Arg led to increased NO and urea production in both control and L-T-treated BPAECs. The Michaelis constant (Km) for both eNOS and iNOS for L-Arg is ~10 µM. Thus the cause of the increase in NO production with increasing extracellular L-Arg is difficult to explain in terms of enzyme kinetics alone. However, this finding is consistent with the study by Buga and colleagues (2) on control and cytokine-treated rat aortic endothelial cells. The effect of extracellular L-Arg concentration on NOS activity has been termed the L-Arg paradox (13). In BPAECs, it has been shown that system y+ transporters exist in close proximity to eNOS in the cell membrane (13), which suggests that eNOS may preferentially utilize extracellular L-Arg. The complex of arginine transporter and eNOS may explain in part the increase in NO production with increasing L-Arg concentration in our study. In terms of AR, the Km for L-Arg is ~1 mM; thus the increased urea production with increasing L-Arg concentrations from 1 to 30 mM may in large part be explained by AR kinetics. Because both NOS and AR utilize L-Arg as a substrate, it may be that the intracellular partitioning of the enzymes influences the amount of L-Arg available to the respective enzymes. Further studies will be needed to determine the exact mechanism responsible for the increase in NO and urea production with increasing extracellular L-Arg concentration.
In summary, we found that treatment with LPS and TNF-
led to an
increase in NO production via induction of both eNOS and iNOS in BPAECs
and to an increase in urea production via AR. We demonstrated for the
first time that treating BPAECs with LPS and TNF-
leads to an
increase in CAT-2 mRNA expression. The LPS-TNF-
-induced increase in
CAT-2 mRNA expression was associated with an increase in the uptake of
L-[3H]Arg by BPAECs. These results suggest
that inflammatory stimuli that increase NO and urea production in
BPAECs also induce CAT-2 expression. This may represent a mechanism for
the endothelial cell to maintain adequate intracellular
L-Arg concentrations in the face of increased
L-Arg metabolism. Furthermore, interruption of
L-Arg uptake or expression of L-Arg
transporters may represent future therapeutic targets in diseases
characterized by NO overproduction such as septic shock and ARDS.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
|---|
We thank Kelly M. Billings for excellent technical assistance. We also thank Benjimen R. Walker and Mark R. Eichinger for editorial assistance.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the American Heart Association, Desert Mountain Affiliate, a grant from the Research Allocation Committee of the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-04050 (to L. G. Chicoine).
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. D. Nelin, Dept. of Pediatrics, Univ. of New Mexico HSC, ACC-3 West, Albuquerque, NM 87131 (E-mail: lnelin{at}salud.unm.edu).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Received 1 December 2000; accepted in final form 2 July 2001.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Block, RD,
Herrera H,
and
Couch M.
Hypoxia inhibits L-arginine uptake by pulmonary artery endothelial cells.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
269:
L574-L580,
1995
2.
Buga, GM,
Singh R,
Pervin S,
Rogers NE,
Schmitz DA,
Jenkinson CP,
Cederbaum SD,
and
Ignarro LJ.
Arginase activity in endothelial cell: inhibition by NG-hydroxy-L-arginine during high-output NO production.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
271:
H1988-H1998,
1996
3.
Chang, IC,
Liao JC,
and
Kuo L.
Arginase modulates nitric oxide production in activated macrophages.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
274:
H342-H348,
1998
4.
De Frutos, T,
Miguel LS,
Garcia-Duran M,
Gonzalez-Fernandez F,
Rodrigues-Feo JA,
Monton M,
Guerra J,
Farre J,
Casado S,
and
Lopez-Farre A.
NO from smooth muscle cells decreases NOS expression in endothelial cells: role of TNF-
.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
277:
H1317-H1325,
1999
5.
Fike, CD,
Kaplowitz MR,
Thomas CJ,
and
Nelin LD.
Chronic hypoxia decreases nitric oxide production and endothelial nitric oxide synthase in newborn pig lungs.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
274:
L517-L526,
1998
6.
Greene, B,
Pacitti AJ,
and
Souba WW.
Characterization of L-arginine transport by pulmonary artery endothelial cells.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
264:
L351-L356,
1993
7.
Hattori, Y,
Kasai K,
and
Gross SS.
Cationic amino acid transporter gene expression in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells and in rats.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
276:
H2020-H2028,
1999
8.
Janne, J,
Alhonen L,
and
Leinonen P.
Polyamines: from molecular biology to clinical applications.
Ann Med
23:
241-259,
1991[ISI][Medline].
9.
Jenkinson, CP,
Grody WW,
and
Cederbaum SD.
Comparative properties of arginases.
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol
114:
107-132,
1996[Medline].
10.
Lind, DS,
Copeland EM,
and
Souba WW.
Endotoxin stimulates arginine transport in pulmonary artery endothelial cells.
Surgery
114:
199-205,
1993[ISI][Medline].
11.
Liu, H,
Song D,
and
Lee SS.
Increased nitric oxide synthase expression in aorta of cirrhotic rats.
Life Sci
64:
1753-1759,
1999[ISI][Medline].
12.
Liu, SF,
Adcock IM,
Old RW,
Barnes PJ,
and
Evans TW.
Differential regulation of the constitutive and inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA by lipopolysaccharide treatment in vivo in the rat.
Crit Care Med
24:
1219-1225,
1996[ISI][Medline].
13.
McDonald, KK,
Zharikov S,
Block ER,
and
Kilberg MS.
A caveolar complex between the cationic amino acid transporter 1 and endothelial nitric oxide synthase may explain the "arginine paradox."
J Biol Chem
272:
31213-31216,
1997
14.
Modolell, M,
Corraliza IM,
Link F,
Soler G,
and
Eichmann K.
Reciprocal regulation of the nitric oxide synthase/arginase balance in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages by TH1 and TH2 cytokines.
Eur J Immunol
25:
1101-1104,
1995[ISI][Medline].
15.
Moncada, S,
and
Higgs A.
The L-arginine nitric oxide pathway.
N Engl J Med
329:
2002-2012,
1993
16.
Nelin, LD,
Thomas CJ,
and
Dawson CA.
The effect of hypoxia on nitric oxide production in the neonatal pig lung.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
271:
H8-H14,
1996
17.
Pan, M,
Wasa M,
Ryan U,
and
Souba W.
Lipopolysaccharide and tumor necrosis factor stimulate lung microvascular arginine uptake, a response attenuated by dexamethasone.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr
20:
50-55,
1996[Abstract].
18.
Priek-Steinhoff, P,
Zink S,
Rosen P,
and
Kelm M.
Transport of L-arginine in arginine-deprived endothelial cells.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
213:
447-453,
1995[ISI][Medline].
19.
Que, LG,
Kantrow SP,
Jenkinson CP,
Piantadosi CA,
and
Huang YCT
Induction of arginase isoforms in the lung during hyperoxia.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
275:
L96-L102,
1998
20.
Resta, TC,
Chicoine LG,
Omdahl JL,
and
Walker BR.
Maintained upregulation of pulmonary eNOS gene and protein expression during recovery from chronic hypoxia.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol
276:
H699-H708,
1999
21.
Rosenkranz-Weiss, P,
Sess WC,
Milstien S,
Kaufman S,
Watson CA,
and
Pober JS.
Regulation of nitric oxide synthesis by proinflammatory cytokines in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: elevations in tetrahydrobiopterin levels enhance endothelial nitric oxide synthase specific activity.
J Clin Invest
93:
2236-2243,
1994.
22.
Schapira, RM,
Wiessner JH,
Morrisey JF,
Almagro UA,
and
Nelin LD.
L-Arginine uptake and metabolism by lung macrophages and neutrophils following intratracheal instillation of silica in vivo.
Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol
19:
308-315,
1998
23.
Schearer, JD,
Richards JR,
Mills JD,
and
Caldwell MD.
Differential regulation of macrophage arginine metabolism: a proposed role in wound healing.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab
272:
E181-E190,
1997
24.
Simmons, WW,
Closs EI,
Cunningham JM,
Smith TW,
and
Kelly RA.
Cytokines and insulin induce cationic amino acid transporter (CAT) expression in cardiac myocytes.
J Biol Chem
271:
11694-11702,
1996
25.
Simmons, WW,
Ungureanu-Longrois D,
Smith GK,
Smith TW,
and
Kelly RA.
Glucocorticoids regulate inducible nitric oxide synthase by inhibiting tetrahydrobiopterin synthesis and L-arginine transport.
J Biol Chem
271:
23928-23937,
1996
26.
Sonoki, T,
Nagasaki A,
Gotoh T,
Takiguchi M,
Takeya M,
Matsuzaki H,
and
Mori M.
Coinduction of nitric oxide synthase and arginase I in cultured rat peritoneal macrophages and rat tissues in vivo by lipopolysaccharide.
J Biol Chem
272:
3689-3693,
1997
27.
Waddington, SN,
Tam FWK,
Cook HT,
and
Cattell V.
Arginase activity is modulated by IL-4 and HOArg in nephritic glomeruli and mesangial cells.
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol
274:
F473-F480,
1998
28.
Wang, WW,
Jenkinson CP,
Giscavage JM,
Kern RM,
Arabolos NS,
Byrns RE,
Cederbaum SD,
and
Ignarro LJ.
Co-induction of arginase and nitric oxide synthase in murine macrophages activated by lipopolysaccharide.
Biochem Biophys Res Commun
210:
1009-1016,
1995[ISI][Medline].
29.
Zharikov, SI,
and
Block ER.
Association of L-arginine transporters with fodrin: implications for hypoxic inhibition of arginine uptake.
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol
278:
L111-L118,
2000
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Chang, L. G. Chicoine, H. Cui, N. L. Kanagy, B. R. Walker, Y. Liu, B. K. English, and L. D. Nelin Cytokine-induced arginase activity in pulmonary endothelial cells is dependent on Src family tyrosine kinase activity Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, October 1, 2008; 295(4): L688 - L697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Gao, X. Xu, S. Belmadani, Y. Park, Z. Tang, A. M. Feldman, W. M. Chilian, and C. Zhang TNF-{alpha} Contributes to Endothelial Dysfunction by Upregulating Arginase in Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., June 1, 2007; 27(6): 1269 - 1275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Stanley, L. G. Chicoine, T. L. Young, K. M. Reber, C. R. Lyons, Y. Liu, and L. D. Nelin Gene transfer with inducible nitric oxide synthase decreases production of urea by arginase in pulmonary arterial endothelial cells Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): L298 - L306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Nelin, L. G. Chicoine, K. M. Reber, B. K. English, T. L. Young, and Y. Liu Cytokine-Induced Endothelial Arginase Expression Is Dependent on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., October 1, 2005; 33(4): 394 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Schafer, T. Wallerath, E. I. Closs, C. Schmidt, P. M. Schwarz, U. Forstermann, and H.-A. Lehr Dexamethasone suppresses eNOS and CAT-1 and induces oxidative stress in mouse resistance arterioles Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H436 - H444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Zhang, T. W. Hein, W. Wang, M. W. Miller, T. W. Fossum, M. M. McDonald, J. D. Humphrey, and L. Kuo Upregulation of Vascular Arginase in Hypertension Decreases Nitric Oxide-Mediated Dilation of Coronary Arterioles Hypertension, December 1, 2004; 44(6): 935 - 943. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Chicoine, M. L. Paffett, T. L. Young, and L. D. Nelin Arginase inhibition increases nitric oxide production in bovine pulmonary arterial endothelial cells Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2004; 287(1): L60 - L68. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. Mann, D. L. Yudilevich, and L. Sobrevia Regulation of Amino Acid and Glucose Transporters in Endothelial and Smooth Muscle Cells Physiol Rev, January 1, 2003; 83(1): 183 - 252. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Teixeira, M. L. Santaolaria, V. Meneu, and E. Alonso Dietary Arginine Slightly and Variably Affects Tissue Polyamine Levels in Male Swiss Albino Mice J. Nutr., December 1, 2002; 132(12): 3715 - 3720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. O. Scumpia, P. J. Sarcia, V. G. DeMarco, B. R. Stevens, and J. W. Skimming Hypothermia attenuates iNOS, CAT-1, CAT-2, and nitric oxide expression in lungs of endotoxemic rats Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): L1231 - L1238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. D. Nelin, G. S. Krenz, L. G. Chicoine, C. A. Dawson, and R. M. Schapira L-Arginine Uptake and Metabolism following in vivo Silica Exposure in Rat Lungs Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., March 1, 2002; 26(3): 348 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||