AJP - Lung Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 291: L30-L37, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajplung.00317.2005
1040-0605/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by King, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by King, J. A.

Hydraulic conductance of pulmonary microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cell monolayers

James C. Parker,1,4 Troy Stevens,2,4 Jason Randall,1,4 David S. Weber,1 and Judy A. King3,4

Departments of 1Physiology, 2Pharmacology, and 3Pathology, and 4Center for Lung Biology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama

Submitted 19 July 2005 ; accepted in final form 23 December 2005


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Endothelial cells isolated from pulmonary arteries (RPAEC) and microcirculation (RPMVEC) of rat lungs were grown to confluence on porous filters and mounted on an Ussing-type chamber. Transmembrane pressure ({Delta}P) was controlled by the reservoir height, and the filtration rate corrected for surface area (Jv/A) was measured by timing fluid movement in a calibrated micropipette. These parameters were used to calculate hydraulic conductance (Lp) by using linear regression of Jv/A on {Delta}P. Mean Lp values for newly confluent RPAEC monolayers were 22 times higher than those for RPMVEC monolayers (28.6 ± 5.6 vs. 1.30 ± 0.50 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1; P ≤ 0.01). After confluence was reached, electrical resistance and Lp remained stable in RPAEC but continued to change in RPMVEC with days in culture. Both phenotypes exhibited an initial time-dependent sealing response, but Lp also had an inverse relationship to {Delta}P in RPMVEC monolayers ≥4 days postconfluence that was attributed to cell overgrowth rather than junctional length. In a comparison of the cadherin contents, E-cadherin was predominant in RPMVEC, but VE-cadherin was predominant in RPAEC. At a constant {Delta}P of 40–45 cmH2O for 2 h, Jv/A increased 225% in RPAEC monolayers but did not change significantly in RPMVEC monolayers. Significant decreases in Lp were obtained after treatment with 5% albumin, GdCl3, or isoproterenol plus rolipram in both phenotypes. Thus lung microvascular endothelial cells exhibited a significantly lower Lp than conduit vessel endothelium, which would limit alveolar flooding relative to perivascular edema cuff formation during increased pulmonary vascular pressures.

capillary permeability; pulmonary edema; VE-cadherin; gadolinium


PULMONARY EDEMA is a life-threatening condition resulting in compromised gas exchange in the lung. Although filtration characteristics of pulmonary artery endothelial cells have been reported (22), the hydraulic conductance (Lp) and hydrostatic pressure responses of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells have not been reported. Pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells comprise the major exchange surface area of the pulmonary circulation, so their filtration properties will largely determine the status of fluid balance in the lung. Segmental partitioning of the filtration coefficient in isolated rat lungs corrected for estimated differences in surface area suggests an Lp for alveolar capillaries that is an order of magnitude lower than that of the filtering conduit vessels (16).

Previous studies from investigators in our group also have demonstrated a reduced baseline permeability to solutes and a reduced permeability response to inflammatory mediators in rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (RPMVEC) compared with rat pulmonary arterial endothelial cells (RPAEC) (9). The mechanism may relate to a reduced store-operated Ca2+ entry and enhanced cAMP turnover in RPMVEC (19), which uncouple permeability from Ca2+ entry (2). During mechanical stress, Ca2+ also may enter endothelial cells through stretch-activated cation channels. Blockade of these channels using GdCl3 was shown to attenuate high-airway pressure mechanical injury in intact rat lungs (15), but the contribution of the segmental endothelial cell phenotypes to this response is unknown. The purpose of the present studies was to compare Lp measurements of cultured RPAEC and RPMVEC monolayers, their responses to a sustained hydrostatic stress, and the effects of pharmacological interventions that modulate permeability.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Isolation and culture of rat lung endothelial cells. Pulmonary vascular endothelial cells were harvested from Sprague-Dawley rats (300–400 g) killed with an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital sodium (Nembutal; Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL). RPAEC were isolated from pulmonary arteries as previously described (3). The heart and lungs were excised, and the main stem pulmonary artery and two vessel generations were isolated. The artery was inverted, and the intimal lining was scraped with a scalpel. Harvested cells were then placed into flasks containing an F-12 nutrient mixture and Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) mixture (1:1) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Passages up to 15 times were used. The endothelial cell phenotype was confirmed by acetylated LDL uptake, factor VIII-Rag staining, and the absence of immunostaining for smooth muscle cell {alpha}-actin.

RPMVEC were cultured as previously described (19). The heart and lungs were removed and placed in a DMEM bath containing penicillin and streptomycin. Thin strips were removed from the lung periphery, finely minced, and transferred to a 15-ml tube containing 3 ml of DMEM and 3 ml of a digestion solution containing 0.5 g of BSA, 10,000 units of type 2 collagenase (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ), and cmf-PBS (GIBCO BRL) to make 10 ml in total volume. The digestion mixture was incubated at 37°C for 15 min and strained through an 80-mesh sieve into a sterile beaker. The sieve was washed with 5 ml of DMEM containing penicillin and streptomycin. The mixture was transferred to a 15-ml conical tube and centrifuged at 300 g for 5 min. The medium was aspirated, and the cells were resuspended in 5 ml of medium containing one part vascular conditioned medium and three parts incomplete medium [80% RPMI 1640, 20% FBS, 12.3 U/ml heparin (Elkins-Sinn, Cherry Hill, NJ), and 6.7 µg/ml Endogro (Vec Technologies, Rensselaer, NY) with 30 µg/ml penicillin and streptomycin]. Centrifugation was repeated, and the cells were resuspended in 3 ml of complete medium, incubated at 37°C for 30 min, and placed onto 35-mm culture dishes. The dishes were checked daily for contaminating cells, which were removed by scraping and aspiration. Endothelial cell colonies were isolated with cloning rings, trypsinized, resuspended in 100 µl of complete medium, and placed as a drop in the center of a T-25 flask. The cells were allowed to attach (1 h at 37°C with 5% CO2) before the addition of 5 ml of complete medium. Cultures were characterized using scanning electron microscopy, uptake of 1,1'-dioctadecyl-3,3,3',3'-tetramethylindocarbocyanine-labeled LDL, and a lectin-binding panel of Helix pomatia, Griffonia simplicifolia, and Glycine max. H. pomatia is selective for RPMVEC, whereas G. simplicifolia and G. max are selective for RPAEC (11). Passages 4–13 were used for experiments.

Experimental protocol. Experiments were performed on monolayers grown by seeding 80,000 cells/cm2 on 12-mm Transwell filters (0.4-µm pore size; Fisher Scientific, Suwanee, GA) and growing to confluence with culture times ranging from 3 to 14 days. Electrical resistance was measured using an EVOM impedance meter and an Endohm resistance well (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). Filters were then mounted on a six-well Ussing diffusion chamber (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA) and perfused with Eagle's minimum essential medium containing 25 mM HEPES. Perfusate was circulated between the apical chamber and reservoir with a Gilson roller pump, and reservoirs were bubbled with 95% O2-5% CO2. Perfusion pressure ({Delta}P) was controlled by adjusting reservoir height, and filtration rates (Jv) were measured by timing the meniscus movements in volumetric pipettes. Simultaneous meniscus movements were recorded for all six chambers with a Watec video camera and Panasonic video recorder. Filtration rates were corrected for filtration surface area (A). Lp (in 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1) was calculated from a regression of Jv/A vs. {Delta}P at different {Delta}P using

Formula 1(1)
In those RPMVEC monolayers where Lp decreased in response to an increased {Delta}P, Lp was calculated using only the {Delta}P at that Jv/A.

Experimental protocols included step changes in {Delta}P or a sustained {Delta}P for 2 h. In selected experiments, 5% BSA, 30 µM GdCl3, or 20 µM isoproterenol plus 10 µM rolipram (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO) were added to the reservoir.

Immunoblotting. RPAEC and RPMVEC were grown to confluence, and cells were lysed with 500 µl of ice-cold lysis buffer at pH 7.4 (50 mM HEPES, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaCl), 1% Triton X-100, protease inhibitors (10 µg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin), and phosphatase inhibitors (50 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate). Solubilized proteins were centrifuged at 14,000 g in a microfuge (4°C) for 15 min, and supernatants were stored at –80°C. Extracted proteins were quantified using the Bradford assay. Samples prepared directly after cell lysis were separated using SDS-PAGE and were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked overnight at 4°C with PBS containing 5% nonfat dry milk and 0.1% Tween 20. The blots were incubated for 1 h with primary antibodies in PBS containing 1% nonfat dry milk and 0.1% Tween 20. After incubation with secondary antibodies for 1 h in PBS containing 1% nonfat dry milk and 0.1% Tween 20, proteins were detected using chemiluminescence. beta-Actin and E-cadherin antibodies were purchased from BD Transduction Laboratories (San Diego, CA). VE-cadherin antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). The relative densities of the protein bands were quantitated using NIH Image version 1.63.

Transmission electron microscopy. Porous filters 1.2 cm in diameter were seeded with RPAEC and RPMVEC in DMEM with 20% FBS. At 1 and 4 days after confluence was reached, the monolayers were fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in cacodylate buffer. For transmission electron microscopy, the filters were rinsed in cacodylate buffer, post-fixed for 1 h with 1% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated using a graded alcohol series, and embedded in PolyBed 812 resin (Polysciences, Warrington, PA). Thin sections (80 nm) were cut from each block with a diamond knife and then stained with uranyl acetate and Reynold's lead citrate. Sections were examined and photographed using a Philips CM 100 transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, OR) (11). The lengths of each complete junction on 10–12 photographs were measured and scaled to the magnification to determine length. We measured 14–16 junctions for each cell type at each time period.

Statistics. Data are expressed as means ± SE. Statistical differences between groups were determined using either Student's t-test for two groups or one-way ANOVA with a Newman-Keuls posttest for multiple groups. A P ≤ 0.05 established a significant difference.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
Initial sealing of monolayers. Lp values differed markedly between endothelial phenotypes, but all monolayers exhibited a sealing effect when first exposed to pressure. Figure 1 summarizes the effects of pressure on Jv/A in monolayers of the two phenotypes. Figure 1A shows examples of the initial pressure-induced sealing with time after a pressure of 20 cmH2O was induced on the monolayers. A least-squares regression was done on each curve to fit an exponential decay curve according to:

Formula 2(2)
where a is the initial flow (cm/s x 10–5), k is the decay rate constant (min–1) and t is the time in minutes. Respective mean values for a, k, r2, and P for RPAEC monolayers (n = 5) were a = 24.5 ± 4.6, k = 0.047 ± 0.011, r2 = 0.85 ± 0.05, and P = 0.006 ± 0.002, and the values for RPMVEC monolayers (n = 7) were a = 0.34 ± 0.11, k = 0.26 ± 0.17, r2 = 0.85 ± 0.07, and P = 0.027 ± 0.12. In only one of seven RPMVEC curves did the regression slope not reach statistical significance. Therefore, these data indicate a consistent time-dependent sealing with an initial increase in applied pressure.


Figure 1
View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of pressure on filtration rate (Jv/A) in endothelial monolayers. A: the initial sealing response of filtration with time in individual monolayers after a pressure increase of 20–25 cmH2O in monolayers of rat pulmonary arterial endothelial cells (RPAEC; n = 5) and rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (RPMVEC; n = 7) cultured for 4–7 days. A summary of least-squares exponential curve fits is presented in the text. B: steady-state Jv/A responses (means ± SE) to step changes in pressure ({Delta}P) in monolayers of RPAEC (bullet; n = 11) and RPMVEC ({circ}; n = 11) 2–3 days postconfluence used to calculate mean Lp values, and older (≥4 days postconfluence) RPMVEC filters that exhibited the pressure-induced sealing response ({blacktriangledown}; n = 10).

 
Filtration rates and hydraulic conductances. Figure 1B summarizes the steady-state Jv/A values (means ± SE) obtained at four different pressures for RPAEC after 4–12 days in culture (n = 11) and for RPMVEC after 4–6 days (n = 11) or 7–12 days in culture (n = 10). In confluent RPAEC and RPMVEC monolayers cultured for 4–6 days and in RPAEC cultured for longer, there was the expected increase in Jv/A with increased pressure. The slopes of linear regression analysis on these responses [(Jv/A)/{Delta}P] were used to calculate Lp for the two phenotypes. All regressions for monolayers during this time period were significant with mean r2 values of 0.92 ± 0.03 for RPAEC and 0.95 ± 0.01 for RPMVEC. In contrast, RPMVEC cultured for longer time periods (Fig. 1B) exhibited an unexpected pressure-induced sealing for steady-state filtration, whereby steady-state Jv/A actually decreased. Filtration rates became vanishingly small at higher pressures, and Lp could not be calculated from a conventional regression analysis. An estimate of Lp could be obtained in these postconfluent RPMVEC monolayers by dividing Jv/A by the absolute pressure increase from zero at each state. In these RPMVEC monolayers, calculated Lp would decrease with pressure rather than remain constant with pressure increases. Estimates of average Lp values obtained using this method for calculating Lp in the mature RPMVEC monolayers were 1.7 x 10–8, 2.7 x 10–9, 1.2 x 10–9, and 5 x 10–10 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1 for pressure increases of 10, 20, 30, and 40 cmH2O, respectively.

Figure 2 summarizes the Lp values (means ± SE) calculated from regression analyses of each experiment in confluent monolayers described in Fig. 1B. For RPAEC and RPMVEC monolayers (n = 11 each), the Lp values averaged 28.6 ± 5.6 and 1.3 ± 0.5 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1, respectively. Thus the average Lp for RPAEC was significantly 22-fold greater than that for RPMVEC.


Figure 2
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Baseline hydraulic conductance (Lp) values, averaged for RPAEC (n = 11) and RPMVEC (n = 11), obtained using acute pressure elevations in monolayers after confluence was reached. *P < 0.03 vs. RPAEC.

 
Effect of days in culture. As previously described by King et al. (11), the endothelial cell growth rates were markedly different between phenotypes, with RPMVEC growing more rapidly than RPAEC. When cells were seeded at 80,000 cells/cm2 and grown in 20% FBS, RPMVEC became confluent after ~3–4 days and RPAEC after 4–5 days. As shown in Fig. 3, electrical resistance initially decreased for 2–3 days and then increased as cells reached confluence. However, RPMVEC resistances (n = 11) continued to increase as long as they remained in culture, whereas RPAEC (n = 10) reached a constant plateau resistance after 5 days in culture. Figure 4 indicates that the initial Lp values in monolayers cultured over this time period also exhibited a significant reduction (P ≤ 0.001) with days in culture for RPMVEC monolayers (n = 6) but remained stable with days in culture for RPAEC monolayers (n = 6). These Lp changes correlated with the monolayer electrical resistance changes with time.


Figure 3
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Electrical resistance of RPMVEC and RPAEC monolayer on filters as a function of days in culture. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. RPAEC.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Initial Lp values in RPMVEC (n = 6) and RPAEC (n = 6) monolayers cultured from 4 to 7 days. Lp was calculated as (Jv/A)/{Delta}P at 40 cmH2O. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. RPAEC at same time period.

 
Effect of a sustained pressure. The endothelial phenotypes also responded differently to a sustained pressure of 40–45 cmH2O. Figure 5 shows the filtration rate as a function of time after an initial sealing during a constant pressure of 40–45 cmH2O for 2 h. Jv/A significantly increased by 225% in RPAEC monolayers from initial values but did not change significantly in RPMVEC monolayers over the same time period. Lp values remained significantly different between phenotypes throughout the period of increased pressure. Estimated Lp in the RPAEC group increased from a mean of 18 x 10–7 to 57 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1. The mean Lp for RPAEC monolayers averaged some 81 times higher than that for RPMVEC monolayers over the 2-h period under these pressure conditions.


Figure 5
View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Mean Jv/A (n = 7) for monolayer of RPAEC and RPMVEC over 2 h at a constant sustained pressure of 40 cmH2O. *P < 0.05 vs. RPMVEC values at same time period. &P < 0.05 vs. other points in the same group.

 
Electron microscopy. To determine whether morphological differences such as junction overlap could account for the unexpected steady-state pressure-related sealing of the mature postconfluent RPMVEC monolayers, we seeded RPAEC and RPMVEC at high density on porous filters and grew them to confluence with 20% FBS. Figure 6 shows transmission electron micrographs of RPAEC (A) and RPMVEC monolayers (B) 1 day after confluence was attained on porous filters. Micrographs of monolayers 4 days after confluence was reached for RPAEC (C) and RPMVEC (D) also are shown (Fig. 6). Variable overlapping of intercellular junctions occurred in both cell types, but RPMVEC formed bilayers when maintained in these culture conditions for longer time periods.


Figure 6
View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Transmission electron micrographs of 1-day postconfluent RPAEC (A) and RPMVEC (B) monolayers and 4-day postconfluent RPAEC (C) and RPMVEC (D) grown on filters. RPMVEC filters cultured for ≥4 days postconfluence in 20% FBS tended to form overlapping layers. Bars indicate scale in µm.

 
Figure 7 summarizes the junctional lengths between cells at 1 and 4 days postconfluence in RPAEC and RPMVEC monolayers. There were no significant differences in junctional lengths between cells in 1- and 4-day postconfluent RPAEC and RPMVEC monolayers adherent to the filter. However, junctional lengths between adjacent cells in the top bilayer were significantly longer than those of other layers. Therefore, rather than differences in cell overlap as originally suspected, the decreasing Lp and pressure-induced decrease in Jv/A that occurred in RPMVEC cultured for longer time periods could be attributed to formation of superimposed monolayers forming a thicker barrier to fluid movement.


Figure 7
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Summary of junctional lengths in RPAEC and RPMVEC filters at 1 and 4 days postconfluence. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. all other groups.

 
Endothelial cadherin content. The relative amounts of baseline E-cadherin and VE-cadherin were evaluated using immunoblotting in the two endothelial phenotypes as a possible source of the Lp differences. Because the observation of differences in cadherin content between phenotypes was somewhat novel, and to obviate the possibility of phenotype drift, we repeated the Western analysis on endothelial cells derived from different rats at different passages. These data are summarized in Table 1. There was a significantly greater amount of E-cadherin in RPMVEC compared with RPAEC and a significantly greater amount of VE-cadherin in RPAEC compared with RPMVEC. These differences were present in both early and late-passage cells in several different rats.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Western analysis of E-cadherin and VE-cadherin contents in RPMVEC and RPAEC from different passages derived from different animals

 
Figure 8 summarizes the mean cadherin contents across different passages and animals for both phenotypes. E-cadherin content was significantly higher (3.0-fold) in RPMVEC compared with RPAEC, whereas VE-cadherin content was significantly greater (7.2-fold) in RPAEC compared with RPMVEC. Example Western blots are shown, and A431 epithelial cells were analyzed as a positive control for E-cadherin.


Figure 8
View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Mean baseline E-cadherin and VE-cadherin evaluated across passages and animals by immunoblotting in RPAEC and RPMVEC. A431 epithelial cells are shown as a positive control for E-cadherin. *P ≤ 0.05 vs. RPAEC.

 
Lp response to drugs. To determine whether the RPMVEC and RPAEC monolayers exhibited characteristic responses to drug interventions despite marked differences in Lp, we measured Lp changes in response to application of albumin solutions, gadolinium, and isoproterenol and rolipram. Responses to these pharmacological interventions were similar to those observed in cultured and in situ endothelial cells from other organs. As shown in Fig. 9, pressure-induced filtration rates and calculated Lp values were significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in both phenotypes by application of 5% albumin to the apical side (n = 4; A), treatment with 30 µM GdCl3 (n = 6; B), and the addition of 20 µM isoproterenol and 10 µM rolipram (n = 3; C). Despite the differences in baseline Lp, the two phenotypes had qualitatively similar responses to these treatments.


Figure 9
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 9. Mean Lp values after drug treatments in both endothelial phenotypes. A: after application of 5% albumin to the apical sides (n = 4). B: after treatment with 30 µM GdCl3 (n = 6). C: after addition of 20 µM isoproterenol (ISO) and 10 µM rolipram (ROLI; n = 3). *P < 0.05 vs. control.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
These studies on cultured monolayers indicate dramatic differences in the baseline hydraulic conductivities and responses to hydrostatic pressure between endothelial cells derived from different vascular segments in the rat lung. Lp values averaged 22 times higher for RPAEC (28.6 ± 5.6 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1) than for RPMVEC (1.30 ± 0.50 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1) in newly confluent monolayers. The baseline Lp values reported for RPAEC monolayers are comparable to Lp values reported for cultured monolayers of porcine pulmonary artery endothelial cells (21.0 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1) (22), bovine aortic endothelial cells (11.4 ± 8.0 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1), and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (29.0 ± 8.5 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1) (12). However, Lp measurements of cultured pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells have not been previously reported.

Measurements and estimates of endothelial cell Lp in situ are generally lower than those measured in cultured monolayers, but in situ estimates also suggest a much lower microvascular Lp than predicted from cultures of conduit vessel endothelial cells. In direct micropuncture measurements of Lp obtained using the split-drop technique in dog lung venules, Bhattacharya (1) calculated Lp values of 2.9 ± 0.02 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1. In later studies using the split drop in surface venules in rat lungs, Safdar et al. (17) calculated a baseline Lp of 4.4 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1, which decreased to 1.5 x 10–7 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1 after hypertonic challenge. Parker and Yoshikawa (16) reported a segmental distribution of the filtration coefficient in isolated rat lungs that was 18% arterial, 41% capillary, and 41% venous, and they used estimates of vascular surface areas based on vascular cast data to estimate Lp values for arterial, venous, and microvascular segments of 6 x 10–8, 1.3 x 10–7, and 1.8 x 10–9 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1. Note that these estimates predicted an Lp for RPAEC that was ~30 times that of the Lp for RPMVEC and an Lp for venules that was ~65 times that for microvascular segments. The venular Lp was approximately the value subsequently reported in isolated rat lungs by investigators using the split-drop technique after hypertonic challenge (17). Other Lp estimates can be derived from morphometric vascular surface area measurements reported by Weibel (27). He reported an average capillary surface area of 0.41 m2 in lungs of 140-g rats. Using our estimates of lung weight (1.22 g) and filtration coefficient (0.1 ml·min–1·cmH2O–1·100 g–1) for this size rat, we can calculate a vascular surface area of 3,360 cm2/g lung weight and an average Lp of 4 x 10–9 cm·s–1·cmH2O–1 from the data. Thus the Lp reported in the present study for cultured RPAEC and RPMVEC are at least an order of magnitude higher than values estimated from morphologic estimates of vascular surface area, but the 22-fold greater Lp that we observed for RPAEC compared with RPMVEC is within a range predicted from morphologic estimates. These data all indicate a much lower fluid conductance of alveolar capillaries than could be predicted from previous studies of systemic conduit vessel endothelial cells.

The marked difference in Lp between RPMVEC and RPAEC mirrors many of the significant differences reported for these segmental endothelial phenotypes. RPMVEC and RPAEC have different embryologic origins, being derived respectively by vasculogenesis and angiogenesis, and RPMVEC have a much higher growth potential than RPAEC (7, 8, 11). King et al. (11) reported that RPMVEC grown for 6 days in 10% FBS had approximately twice the cell number as RPAEC when seeded at the same cell densities. In fact, the RPMVEC tended to overgrow and actually form bilayers when cultured for long periods (Fig. 6D). The faster growth rate and tighter junctional permeability of RPMVEC suggest many epithelial-like characteristics. Epithelial monolayers generally have electrical resistances an order of magnitude higher than that of endothelial monolayers and much lower solute diffusion permeabilities (10). The fact that E-cadherin was the major adherens junction cadherin identified in RPMVEC could partially account for the lower permeability of the RPMVEC monolayers (17). VE-cadherin has been considered the major cadherin in endothelial cells from most other vascular beds and was the major cadherin present in RPAEC (4). Although RPMVEC bind distinctly different lectins than RPAEC, both phenotypes retain surface marker characteristics of endothelial cells such as acetylated LDL uptake, factor VIII expression, and the absence of immunostaining for smooth muscle actin (11). In addition to the lower baseline permeability to water and solutes, RPMVEC have an attenuated responsiveness to inflammatory mediators compared with RPAEC. Kelly et al. (9) reported significantly lower permeabilities to different-sized dextrans diffusing across monolayers of RPMVEC compared with RPAEC both at baseline and when exposed to thapsigargin, an irreversible inhibitor of intracellular Ca2+ uptake and opener of store-operated Ca2+ channels. The baseline lower Lp values reported for the first time in the present study for RPMVEC monolayers are compatible with tighter junctions and lower diffusional permeability reported by Kelly et al. (9). A higher turnover rate for intracellular cAMP also could contribute to the lower baseline permeability of RPMVEC to fluid and solutes (3). Recent reports suggest that RPMVEC lack a Ca2+-specific, store-operated channel, which could account for the apparent uncoupling of barrier permeability from intracellular Ca2+ increases (2, 21, 28). However, the reduced Lp responses to addition of 5% albumin, GdCl3, or drugs that increase intracellular cAMP were similar to the responses predicted from other cultured and in situ endothelial phenotypes and were present in both lung endothelial phenotypes (14, 15, 20).

All epithelial and endothelial monolayers "seal" to some extent with time when first exposed to pressure, and all of these experiments were begun by sealing the monolayers at 15–20 cmH2O. Both endothelial phenotypes exhibited this phenomenon (Fig. 1A). This effect is attributed to a passive compression of glycosaminoglycan and proteoglycan elements of the basement membrane, junctional pathways, and intercellular portions of the glycocalyx, in addition to active recruitment of zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) to the tight junctions (6, 18). After initial sealing, a steady-state filtration rate is attained that is proportional to the applied pressure, and this relationship is a prerequisite for a valid calculation of Lp using a least-squares regression. These conditions were met for monolayers of both phenotypes for the first few days after confluence was reached and by RPAEC for longer periods in culture. An interesting feature of the older RPMVEC monolayers was a further "sealing" effect at progressively higher pressures in monolayers when used after more than 4–5 days after confluence was reached. That is, steady-state Jv/A was actually decreased by each pressure increase so that the conventional method for calculation of Lp could not be employed. Most previous studies of Lp in endothelial monolayers have used conduit vessel endothelial cells, and pressure-induced sealing has not been observed in conduit vessel studies or in single-capillary measurements of Lp (13). The continued growth of the RPMVEC monolayers in culture, continued increases in monolayer electrical resistances, and decreases in Lp estimates suggested that changes in junctional structure such as more extensive overlap of cell edges could account for these observed differences between RPMVEC and RPAEC. However, morphologic measurements revealed that junction lengths were not significantly different between phenotypes (Fig. 7). Rather, the RPMVEC escaped contact inhibition of growth, and the overgrowth formed superimposed monolayers. Although growth was strongly stimulated by the 20% FBS in the medium, formation of multiple layers is not observed in normal lung capillaries. The overgrowth of stimulated RPMVEC may represent a condition of exuberant endothelial growth observed in the obstructive arteriolar lesions of primary pulmonary hypertension. In this condition, the obliteration of small precapillary pulmonary arteries by proliferating endothelial cells produces fatal pulmonary hypertension (26). Hydrostatic compression of multiple cell layers could also block and compress paracellular pathway dimensions sufficient to restrict fluid movement and produce the lower Jv/A observed as pressure increased in the overgrown RPMVEC filters.

The responses to a sustained pressure gradient over time also were considerably different between endothelial phenotypes. Tarbell et al. (23) reported a 350% increase in Lp for bovine aortic endothelial cell monolayers subjected to a sustained pressure of 30 cmH2O for 4 h that was comparable to the 225% increase in Lp we observed at 2 h for the RPAEC monolayers under 40 cmH2O of sustained pressure. They proposed that the shear stress effect of filtration through junctional clefts increased junctional permeability to water flow during continuous filtration. In other studies, the Lp of bovine aortic endothelial cell monolayers was increased by surface laminar shear stress that was accompanied by a decrease in junctional ZO-1 (5). In contrast to the pressure-induced increased Lp in RPAEC, we found that the Lp increase in RPMVEC monolayers did not reach significance during the 2-h period of a sustained transmural pressure gradient. The failure of RPMVEC to respond to pressure stress supports previous observations that, unlike RPAEC, the RPMVEC do not realign under sustained shear stress or cyclical stretch (unpublished data). Tarbell et al. (23) could reverse the Lp increase due to sustained hydrostatic pressure by adding 1 mM dibutyryl cAMP, a protein kinase A agonist. We also observed that both lung endothelial phenotypes responded by a significant reduction in Lp to the combination of isoproterenol and rolipram to increase intracellular cAMP. Thus the pressure-induced increase in Lp caused by junctional filtration shear appears to be a property of conduit vessel endothelial cells that is attenuated in RPMVEC monolayers.

A low alveolar capillary Lp also would have important implications for lung fluid homeostasis. To efficiently exchange respiratory gases by diffusion, the alveolar capillary endothelium has a surface area in humans that may exceed 100 m2, and thickness of the alveolar capillary barrier is only 0.35–1.0 µm over much of this area (25). However, this architecture also facilitates fluid filtration, which in turn could interfere with gas exchange if alveoli flood with fluid. Among the adjustments in Starling tissue forces that contribute to the Starling "safety factors" against edema, an increase in lymph flow is considered to contribute only a few millimeters of Hg of protection against increased hydrostatic pressure (24). To the traditional Starling safety factors we can now add a capillary endothelial barrier that is at least 20 times more restrictive to fluid transport than previously surmised. Considering the magnitude of the measured Lp differences between RPMVEC and RPAEC, the contribution of such a low Lp for preventing edema formation across the pulmonary capillaries would quantitatively exceed the passive contribution of adjustments in all other Starling forces, because the alveolar capillaries would require at least 22-fold greater hydrostatic pressure than that required for an equivalent filtration across a comparable surface area of arterial segments (24). This low microvascular Lp could be a determinant in the well-known pattern of early hydrostatic edema formation in lungs where edema first accumulates in perivascular cuffs around small conduit vessels, which we have shown to have a considerably higher Lp (24).


    GRANTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 
This work was supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant P01 HL-66299.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. C. Parker, Dept. of Physiology, MSB 3074, College of Medicine, Univ. of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688 (e-mail: Jparker{at}usouthal.edu)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 GRANTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Bhattacharya J. Hydraulic conductivity of lung venules determined by split-drop technique. J Appl Physiol 64: 2562–2567, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Cioffi DL, Wu S, and Stevens T. On the endothelial cell I(SOC). Cell Calcium 33: 323–336, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  3. Creighton JR, Masada N, Cooper DM, and Stevens T. Coordinate regulation of membrane cAMP by Ca2+-inhibited adenylyl cyclase and phosphodiesterase activities. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 284: L100–L107, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Dejana E, Lampugnani MG, Martinez-Estrada O, and Bazzoni G. The molecular organization of endothelial junctions and their functional role in vascular morphogenesis and permeability. Int J Dev Biol 44: 743–748, 2000.[ISI][Medline]
  5. Demaio L, Chang YS, Gardner TW, Tarbell JM, and Antonetti DA. Shear stress regulates occludin content and phosphorylation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 281: H105–H113, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Demaio L, Tarbell JM, Scaduto RC Jr, Gardner TW, and Antonetti DA. A transmural pressure gradient induces mechanical and biological adaptive responses in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 286: H731–H741, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Demello DE, Sawyer D, Galvin N, and Reid LM. Early fetal development of lung vasculature. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 16: 568–581, 1997.[Abstract]
  8. Gebb S and Stevens T. On lung endothelial cell heterogeneity. Microvasc Res 68: 1–12, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  9. Kelly JJ, Moore TM, Babal P, Diwan AH, Stevens T, and Thompson WJ. Pulmonary microvascular and macrovascular endothelial cells: differential regulation of Ca2+ and permeability. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 274: L810–L819, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kim KJ and Malik AB. Protein transport across the lung epithelial barrier. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 284: L247–L259, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. King J, Hamil T, Creighton J, Wu S, Bhat P, McDonald F, and Stevens T. Structural and functional characteristics of lung macro- and microvascular endothelial cell phenotypes. Microvasc Res 67: 139–151, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  12. Luckett PM, Fischbarg J, Bhattacharya J, and Silverstein SC. Hydraulic conductivity of endothelial cell monolayers cultured on human amnion. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 256: H1675–H1683, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Michel CC and Curry FE. Microvascular permeability. Physiol Rev 79: 703–761, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Parker JC. Inhibitors of myosin light chain kinase, phosphodiesterase and calmodulin attenuate ventilator induced lung injury. J Appl Physiol 89: 2241–2248, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Parker JC, Ivey C, and Tucker A. Gadolinium prevents high airway pressure induced permeability increases in isolated rat lungs. J Appl Physiol 84: 1113–1118, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Parker JC and Yoshikawa S. Vascular segmental permeabilities at high peak inflation pressure in isolated rat lungs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 283: L1203–L1209, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Safdar Z, Wang P, Ichimura H, Issekutz AC, Quadri S, and Bhattacharya J. Hyperosmolarity enhances the lung capillary barrier. J Clin Invest 112: 1541–1549, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  18. Sill H, Butler C, Hollis TM, and Tarbell JM. Albumin permeability and electrical resistance as means of assessing endothelial monolayer integrity in vitro. J Tissue Cult Methods 14: 253–258, 1992.[CrossRef]
  19. Stevens T, Creighton J, and Thompson WJ. Control of cAMP in lung endothelial cell phenotypes. Implications for control of barrier function. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 277: L119–L126, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Stevens T, Garcia JG, Shasby DM, Bhattacharya J, and Malik AB. Mechanisms regulating endothelial cell barrier function. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 279: L419–L422, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Stevens T, Rosenberg R, Aird W, Quertermous T, Johnson FL, Garcia JG, Hebbel RP, Tuder RM, and Garfinkel S. NHLBI workshop report: endothelial cell phenotypes in heart, lung, and blood diseases. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 281: C1422–C1433, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Suttorp N, Hessz T, Seeger W, Wilke A, Koob R, Lutz F, and Drenckhahn D. Bacterial exotoxins and endothelial permeability for water and albumin in vitro. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 255: C368–C376, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Tarbell JM, Demaio L, and Zaw MM. Effect of pressure on hydraulic conductivity of endothelial monolayers: role of endothelial cleft shear stress. J Appl Physiol 87: 261–268, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Taylor AE and Parker JC. The interstitial spaces and lymph flow. In: Handbook of Physiology: The Respiratory System. Circulation and Nonrespiratory Function. Bethesda, MD: Am Physiol Soc, 1985, sect. 3, vol. I, p. 167–320.
  25. Taylor AE, Rehder K, Hyatt RE, and Parker JC. Clinical Respiratory Physiology. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 1989.
  26. Voelkel NF, Cool C, Taraceviene-Stewart L, Geraci MW, Yeager M, Bull T, Kasper M, and Tuder RM. Janus face of vascular endothelial growth factor: the obligatory survival factor for lung vascular endothelium controls precapillary artery remodeling in severe pulmonary hypertension. Crit Care Med 30: S251–S256, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  27. Weibel ER. Morphologic basis of alveolar-capillary gas exchange. Physiol Rev 53: 419–495, 1973.[Free Full Text]
  28. Wu S, Sangerman J, Li M, Brough GH, Goodman SR, and Stevens T. Essential control of an endothelial cell ISOC by the spectrin membrane skeleton. J Cell Biol 154: 1225–1233, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
T. Stevens, S. Phan, M. G. Frid, D. Alvarez, E. Herzog, and K. R. Stenmark
Lung Vascular Cell Heterogeneity: Endothelium, Smooth Muscle, and Fibroblasts
Proceedings of the ATS, September 15, 2008; 5(7): 783 - 791.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
V. Solodushko, J. C. Parker, and B. Fouty
Pulmonary Microvascular Endothelial Cells Form a Tighter Monolayer when Grown in Chronic Hypoxia
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2008; 38(4): 491 - 497.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
J. Clark, D. F. Alvarez, M. Alexeyev, J. A. C. King, L. Huang, M. C. Yoder, and T. Stevens
Regulatory role for nucleosome assembly protein-1 in the proliferative and vasculogenic phenotype of pulmonary endothelium
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): L431 - L439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
D. F. Alvarez, L. Huang, J. A. King, M. K. ElZarrad, M. C. Yoder, and T. Stevens
Lung microvascular endothelium is enriched with progenitor cells that exhibit vasculogenic capacity
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): L419 - L430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
D. M. Shasby
Cell-cell adhesion in lung endothelium
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): L593 - L607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
W. C. Aird
Phenotypic Heterogeneity of the Endothelium: II. Representative Vascular Beds
Circ. Res., February 2, 2007; 100(2): 174 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
J. C. Parker
Hydraulic conductance of lung endothelial phenotypes and Starling safety factors against edema
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 2007; 292(2): L378 - L380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
S. K. Quadri and J. Bhattacharya
Resealing of endothelial junctions by focal adhesion kinase
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, January 1, 2007; 292(1): L334 - L342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by King, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by King, J. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.